Home / Music / Review: sE Electronics 2200a II C – the only mic you’ll ever need?

Review: sE Electronics 2200a II C – the only mic you’ll ever need?

I think it’s common for every musician or home recording enthusiast to have a favorite microphone: that one in their mic box that they just keep going back to.

For me, that microphone is the sE Electronics 2200a. An original one though. I became an enthusiast when a producer I was recording with was using it for literally everything – electrics guitars, acoustic guitars, vocals, percussion… whatever. When I decided to save costs by investing in my own home recording instead of continually going to a studio, it was an obvious choice of microphone to have.

sE Electronics brought out a revised version of the 2200a a few years back, so I was keen to see what it would be like in comparison to my trusty, and somewhat battered, original. The Mark II actually comes in two versions: the 2200 II C, which is a cardioid version, or the 2200 II, without any additional letters, which is a multi-direction version.

We’ll be looking at the classic cardioid version.

Core specs

What kind of capsule is it? Hand-crafted true condenser
Diaphragm? 32mm gold/mylar
Directional pattern? Cardioid
Frequency range? 20 Hz – 20 kHz
Signal to noise ratio 80 dB

Microphones always have so many numbers and different units of measurement listed in their specifications. Honestly, I’m not much of a numbers man, and if you have an in-depth understanding of these numbers, you’re a whole bunch smarter than me.

Unfortunately, I don’t have much to go on except whether or not it does what I need.

The scenario

At this price, the 2200a II C is made in the east, and mass-produced. This is aimed very much at what I would call intermediate home recording enthusiasts. It’s higher end than the brandless SM58 clones, but equally a long way from a $10k+ Telefunken job.

To give the best overview of the mic, I thought it best to use it to record a variety of things.

Obviously, the room you record in is one of the most important factors to the sound. I was in a medium sized living room, with some furniture and a carpeted floor. Nothing too boomy: quite a flat sounding room overall.

I’m recording through the built-in audio interface on a set of Samson Studio GT-40 monitors, into a Windows 10 PC, and my DAW of choice is Reaper.

It’s not a setup that will win any Grammys, and the good people at Abbey Road wouldn’t feel threatened, but it does what I need.

Sounds

I could write an entire book detailing the different positions and settings I used across my testing, so I’ll stick to some highlights, namely at the flat, 0dB setting of the mic.

Starting with a little acoustic guitar to lay down as a rhythm, I opted for the standard position of pointing the top of the mic at the sound hole. The results sounded somewhat brash, I felt, but nothing a post-compression EQ tweak wouldn’t resolve. I’d say the results in terms of the microphone were satisfactory.

Moving on, I used a single coil electric guitar plugged into a 30 watt, single speaker, solid state amp. I ignored the effects, opting for the guitar/amp’s natural sound. With the amp raised off the floor, I put the 2200a pointing at the centre of the speaker, a few inches out, at a slight angle. It certainly picked up the driven sound I was going for!

Obviously, recording electric guitar is incredibly subjective: the positions I liked and taht I felt worked for me may not work for another player.

Next up, some vocals. Vocals are such a weird thing to record: everybody’s voice has different characteristics that some mics pick up on better than others. In a professional recording scenario, you try a bunch and then pick which works best. Not really an option here.

I would describe the vocals I recorded in testing it as OK. I’ve certainly heard much worse. I wouldn’t say it’s 100% right for my voice, but again, I’m not trying to impress anybody!

I’ll be honest, I don’t know what makes an ideal microphone for percussion. I recorded some shaker and some tambourine, and I thought they both sounded fine, but I’m open to being schooled with further intel.

Conclusion

This is a fine microphone for having around the house for recording. None of the resulting tones were awful, but if you had the time and money, you would likely get a number of mics that would specifically record different things better.

I guess that makes it a jack of all trades, master of none microphone, but realistically, if you’ve got the money, you wouldn’t have been looking at this to start with.

The cardioid one costs $100 less than the multi-pattern one. I don’t know if the difference is worth that, but I would say that’s a comparison review for another day.

MORE COUPONS?
ReviewingThis is constantly updated with new reviews and coupons. If you're interested in receiving updates, then feel free to sign up to our newsletter!
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.
I think it’s common for every musician or home recording enthusiast to have a favorite microphone: that one in their mic box that they just keep going back to. For me, that microphone is the sE Electronics 2200a. An original one though. I became an enthusiast when a producer I was recording with was using it for literally everything - electrics guitars, acoustic guitars, vocals, percussion… whatever. When I decided to save costs by investing in my own home recording instead of continually going to a studio, it was an obvious choice of microphone to have. sE Electronics brought out…

sE Electronics 2200a II C

Parts
Construction
Recording quality
Value for money

A good all-round mic for home recording

User Rating: Be the first one !

Check Also

Review: Hercules GS414B guitar stand – is this the only guitar stand you need?

I wrote a while ago about my wonderful Hercules guitar rack. I love it to …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *